Do Skepticism, Independence, and Competence Matter? Evidence on Factors Influencing Auditors’ Fraud Detection Ability

Authors

  • Rina Yuliastuty Asmara Universitas Mercu Buana, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54518/rh.5.6.2025.926

Keywords:

Auditor Independence, Fraud Detection, Internal Audit, Professional Competence, Professional Skepticism

Abstract

This study addresses a critical gap by exploring how individual auditor attributes affect fraud detection performance in the public sector context. This study aims to examine the influence of professional skepticism, independence, and professional competence on internal auditors’ ability to detect fraud within ministries and governmental institutions in Indonesia. A quantitative causal research design was employed, using a stratified random sampling technique to collect data from 96 internal auditors across various Indonesian ministries and agencies. Data were analyzed using Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to assess first- and second-order constructs. The results show that all three independent variables significantly influence fraud detection ability. Among them, independence has the strongest effect, followed by professional competence and professional skepticism. These findings underscore the importance of maintaining auditor autonomy and enhancing technical capabilities to improve fraud detection in the public sector. The study suggests that government institutions should prioritize training programs that strengthen auditors’ independence and professional competence. Internal audit policies must also reinforce structural independence to ensure objective fraud detection efforts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adrian, M., Anggraini, N., Azzahra, S. B. R., & Lussianda, E. O. (2024). The influence of independence, professionalism, individual morality and the effectiveness of internal control on fraud detection. Husnayain Business Review, 4(1), 62-75.

Affandi, A. M. J. (2024). Pengaruh kompetensi, independensi, dan skeptisme profesional terhadap kemampuan auditor mendeteksi kecurangan. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Politala, 7(1), 124–135.

Amyar, F., Rahma, A., Azis, N., & Suwarno, S. (2023). The effect of auditor’s professional skepticism and whistleblowing system on fraud detection: Evidence from Indonesian public sector audit. Research Horizon, 3(4), 477–486.

Aulia, D. (2023). The impact of ethical awareness, auditor experience, skepticism attitude, and time pressure on detecting fraud in public accountant offices in the city of Medan. Journal of Research in Business, Economics, and Education, 5(4), 89-102.

Bonrath, A., & Eulerich, M. (2024). Internal auditing’s role in preventing and detecting fraud: An empirical analysis. International Journal of Auditing, 28(4), 615–631.

Chui, L., Curtis, M. B., & Pike, B. J. (2022). How does an audit or a forensic perspective influence auditors’ fraud-risk assessment and subsequent risk response? Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 41(4), 57–83.

Dasila, R. A., & Hajering, H. (2019). Pengaruh pengalaman, independensi dan skeptisme profesional auditor terhadap pendeteksian fraud. Paradoks: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi, 2(1), 61-80.

Endri, E. (2020). The effect of task complexity, independence and competence on the quality of audit results with auditor integrity as a moderating variable. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 12(12), 1-14.

Ghani, E. K. G. K., Ilias, A., Muhammad, K., & Ali, M. M. (2023). Exploring hurtt’s professional scepticism scale for public sector accountants in Malaysia. IPN Journal of Research and Practice in Public Sector Accounting and Management, 12(1), 57–77.

Gunawan, K., Riyanal, M. F., & Handoko, B. L. (2022). The effect of auditor competence, professional skepticism, red flag, and internal control system on fraud detection. Journal of Applied Finance and Accounting, 9(2), 91-103.

Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24.

Husnah, H. N., Sari, R., & Mapparenta, M. (2024). The effect of professional skepticism on fraud detection with auditor training as a moderating variable. Advances In Managerial Auditing Research, 2(3), 144-156.

Indah, S. N. M. (2022). The effect of auditor competence and independence on audit quality. Indonesia Auditing Research Journal, 11(4), 1-12.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (2019). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. In Corporate governance (pp. 77–132). London: Gower.

Khaksar, J., Salehi, M., & DashtBayaz, M. L. (2021). The relationship between auditor characteristics and fraud detection. Journal of Facilities Management, 20(1), 79–101.

La Ode, A., Wahyuniati, H., Angela, F., & Oktri, S. (2020). Auditor’s ability to detect fraud: Independence, audit experience, professional skepticism, and work load. Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences, 107(11), 192–205.

Lamba, R. A., Yohanes, C. S., Lamba, A., & Pattiasina, V. (2020). The effect of auditor independence and ethics on auditor professional scepticism: Its implications for audit quality in Indonesia. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 12(8), 383–396.

Mandal, A., & Amilan, S. (2023). Fathoming fraud: Unveiling theories, investigating pathways and combating fraud. Journal of Financial Crime, 31(5), 1106–1125.

Mokoagouw, M., Kalangi, L., & Gerungai, N. (2018). Pengaruh skeptisme profesional dan pengalaman auditor terhadap kemampuan auditor eksternal dalam mendeteksi kecurangan (Survei pada auditor BPK RI Perwakilan Sulawesi Utara). Going Concern: Jurnal Riset Akuntansi, 13(02), 43-55.

Morales-Sánchez, R., Orta-Pérez, M., & Rodríguez-Serrano, M. Á. (2020). The benefits of auditors’ sustained ethical behavior: increased trust and reduced costs. Journal of Business Ethics, 166(2), 441–459.

Nanjundeswaraswamy, T. S., & Divakar, S. (2021). Determination of sample size and sampling methods in applied research. Proceedings on Engineering Sciences, 3(1), 25–32.

Njagi, M. (2023). Independence of internal auditors: significance, guidelines, and influencing factors. East African Finance Journal, 2(1), 56-63.

Noch, M. Y., Ibrahim, M. B. H., Akbar, M. A., Kartim, K., & Sutisman, E. (2022). Independence and competence on audit fraud detection: role of professional skepticism as moderating. Jurnal Akuntansi, 26(1), 1-13.

Novita, N., Anissa, A., & Nanda, A. I. (2022). The role of data analytics for detecting indications of fraud in the public sector. International Journal of Research in Business & Social Science, 11(7), 218-230.

Okoye, K., & Hosseini, S. (2024). Understanding dependent and independent variables in research experiments and hypothesis testing. In K. Okoye & S. Hosseini (Eds.), R Programming: Statistical Data Analysis in Research (pp. 99–107). Cham: Springer Nature.

Paranata, A. (2025). A systematic literature review of anti-corruption policy: a future research agenda in Indonesia. Public Organization Review, 2(2), 13-25.

Prameswari, A. D. P., Purwohedi, U., & Respati, D. K. (2022). Factors affecting auditor’s ability to detect fraud. Jurnal Akuntansi, Perpajakan dan Auditing, 3(1), 1-18.

Rahim, S., Ahmad, H., Widya, A., & Junaidi, J. (2023). Auditors’ experience in financial statement fraud detection: The role of professional scepticism and idealism. Management & Accounting Review (MAR), 22(3), 202–222.

Ramos, S., Perez-Lopez, J. A., & Abreu, R. (2024). Bibliometric analysis of artificial intelligence trends in auditing and fraud detection. Corporate Governance and Organizational Behavior Review, 8(2), 330–342.

Razali, F. M., Sulaiman, N., Abdul Manan, D. I., & Said, J. (2025). Sustainability of audit profession in digital technology era: the role of competencies and digital technology capabilities to detect fraud risk. SAGE Open, 15(1), 215-230.

Sajadi, S. H., Safarzadeh Bandari, M. H., & Herouzi, H. A. (2022). The prediction of professional skepticism components based on the big five personality traits of auditing partners. International Journal of Management, Accounting & Economics, 9(10), 643-655.

Subawa, N. S., Ningrat, F. A., Utami, M. S. M., Prabarini, N. S. D., Yanti, N. K. W., & Basmantra, I. N. (2024). Auditors ability in detecting fraud: evidence from external auditor in Bali. In B. Alareeni & A. Hamdan (Eds.), Technology and Business Model Innovation: Challenges and Opportunities (pp. 506–515). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.

Sudirman, S., Sasmita, H., D, M. D., Krisnanto, B., & Muchsidin, F. F. (2021). Effectiveness of internal audit in supporting internal control and prevention of fraud. Bongaya Journal of Research in Accounting (BJRA), 4(1), 13-25.

Surya, A. H. W. J., Lannai, D., & Amiruddin, A. (2021). Effect of integrity, work experience and compensation on fraud detection through professional skepticism. Point of View Research Accounting and Auditing, 2(3), 192-211.

Tchokoté, I. D., & Tiomeguim, J. T. (2024). The effects of competence and auditor training on fraud detection within multinational companies in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, 20(1), 1-13.

Toloh, P. W. Y. (2024). Conflicts of interest and handling mechanisms in public finances management. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 10(1), 56-67.

Wahidahwati, W., & Asyik, N. F. (2022). Determinants of auditors ability in fraud detection. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1), 213-230.

Wiraputra, M. R., Damayanti, F., & Haryono. (2025). Determination of fraud diamond theory in detecting fraud in financial reporting. Research Horizon, 5(4), 1401–1414.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

Asmara, R. Y. (2025). Do Skepticism, Independence, and Competence Matter? Evidence on Factors Influencing Auditors’ Fraud Detection Ability. Research Horizon, 5(6), 2613–2626. https://doi.org/10.54518/rh.5.6.2025.926