Legal Implications of Violating Healthcare Service Standards for BPJS Patients: A Juridical Study

Authors

  • Enggar Adi Nugroho Universitas Islam Nusantara, Indonesia
  • Happy Yulia Anggraeni Universitas Islam Nusantara, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54518/rh.5.6.2025.900

Keywords:

Accountability, BPJS Patients, Healthcare, Juridical Study, Legal Protection, Liability

Abstract

Legal protection for Social Security Administration Agency (Badan Penyelenggaran Jaminan Sosial/BPJS) participants in cases of violations of healthcare service standards remains a critical issue. This study purpose to analyze the effectiveness of civil, criminal, and administrative legal mechanisms in providing repressive legal protection for Social Security Administration Agency patients in cases of medical negligence. Using a normative juridical approach, the research examines three civil court decisions from 2019–2023 that explicitly involve BPJS patients and complements this with an analysis of relevant criminal and administrative regulations, including the role of the Indonesian Medical Disciplinary Honor Council. The study reviews the Civil Code, the Criminal Code, Law Number 17 of 2023 on Health, and Law Number 29 of 2004 on Medical Practice. The results show that all three lawsuits filed by BPJS patients were rejected or declared inadmissible due to procedural defects, error in persona, or the high burden of proof for medical negligence. Criminal liability under Articles 359–360 of the Criminal Code is applied selectively, while MKDKI sanctions function predominantly in a preventive rather than corrective manner. It is concluded that legal protection for BPJS participants remains largely normative and ineffective in practice, requiring reforms to evidentiary standards and accountability mechanisms.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ardi, M. K., Laksito, F., & Laurent, A. (2023). Role and position of Indonesian Medical Disciplinary Honour Council: Fair medical dispute resolution. Journal of Law, Environmental and Justice, 4(5), 23-25.

Atmoko, D. (2022). Settlement of medical disputes through the forum of the Indonesian Medical Discipline Honorary Assembly (MKDKI) based on Article 66 of Law Number 29 of 2004 concerning medical practice. Awang Long Law Review, 2(3), 13-25.

Auliya, M. F., & Suminar, S. R. (2024). Legal protection for BPJS participants against hospital services that harm patients based on Law Number 17 of 2023 concerning Health in conjunction with BPJS Regulation Number 1 of 2014 concerning Insurance. Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies, 4(5), 34-45.

Azzahra, S. A. N., & Mufidi, M. F. (2021). Tanggung jawab petugas kesehatan terhadap kerahasiaan dokumen pasien dalam melakukan pelayanan medis ditinjau dari UU No. 44 Tahun 2009 dihubungkan dengan Permenkes No. 269/Menkes/Per/III/2008 tentang rekam medis. Bandung: Universitas Islam Bandung (Bachelor’s Thesis).

Batubara, S. A., Rumapea, M. S., & Yusriando, Y. (2020). Pertanggungjawaban pidana rumah sakit terhadap tindak pidana pemalsuan jumlah tagihan uang kepada BPJS. Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP), 3(1), 45-57.

Cikarang District Court. (2019). Decision Number 120/Pdt.G/2019.

Dwike, A., Efrila, E., & Prasetyo, B. (2025). Revisiting the legal implications of medical malpractice: A case study in Indonesia. Ranah Research: Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 7(5), 3775–3788.

Estrada, D. (2024). Perlindungan hukum terhadap dokter dalam melakukan praktik kedokteran terkait dengan dugaan pelanggaran disiplin yang berdampak terhadap malpraktik. ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora, 2(2), 137–153.

Fitria, D., Sulisna, A., & Dermawan, R. P. (2024). Factors influencing BPJS patients' lack of understanding of the outpatient referral system. Jurnal Perilaku Kesehatan Terpadu, 3(2), 108–120.

Hadjon, P. M., Martosoewignjo, R. S. S., Basah, S., Manan, B., Marzuki, H. M. L., ten Berge, J. B. J. M., van Buuren, P. J. J., & Stroink, F. A. M. (2024). Pengantar hukum administrasi Indonesia. Yogyakarta: UGM Press.

Haryanto, G., Ambarwati, E., & Lany, A. (2025). Legal protection for medical personnel in BPJS affiliated hospitals based on Law Number 17 of 2023. Research Horizon, 5(4), 1513–1522.

Irawati, A. C., Kristiningrum, W., & Andayani, A. (2020). Pendampingan perlindungan hukum pelayanan kesehatan melalui informed consent. Indonesian Journal of Community Empowerment (IJCE), 2(2), 14-16.

Kepanjen District Court. (2021). Decision Number 63/Pdt.G/2021.

Lathoif, M. I., & Budiarsih, B. (2024). The strength of proof of MKDKI decisions in medical crime cases in Indonesia. Activa Yuris: Jurnal Hukum, 4(1), 34-37.

Lemke, J. (2025). The normative framework: Objectives of state responsibility in international law. In The Protection of Community Interests in the International Law of State Responsibility (pp. 83–125). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.

Miharja, M. (2020). Sanksi administratif malpraktik bagi dokter dan rumah sakit di Indonesia. DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 5(1), 51–56.

Novriansyah, V., Pasamai, S., & Anzar, A. (2021). Tanggung jawab dokter akibat malpraktik medis dalam perspektif hukum perdata. Journal of Lex Generalis (JLG), 2(3), 957–971.

Nuraeni, Y., & Sihombing, A. S. (2024). The malpractice administration procedure in the vortex of crime. Jurnal Akta, 11(2), 482-495.

Nurvidyaning, S. E., Sanjaya, K. E. J., & Anggraeni, H. Y. (2025). Legal review of standard inpatient class policy in Indonesia’s National Health Insurance system. Research Horizon, 5(3), 807–816.

Paramartha, I. W. A., Budiartha, I. N. P., & Seputra, I. P. G. (2021). Perlindungan hukum terhadap pasien BPJS yang mengalami cacat fisik akibat malpraktek dokter. Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum, 2(3), 594–598.

Praja, N. I., Ferianasari, I. W., & Jaqualina, C. (2024). The effectiveness of Health BPJS claim discrepancies against health service standards in Indonesia. FIRM Journal of Management Studies, 9(1), 164–177.

Quintarti, M. A. L., Silapurna, E. L., Hak, D. A., Purwoto, A., & Supriadi, B. (2025). Legal implications of health service denial for BPJS patients. International Journal of Health, Economics, and Social Sciences (IJHESS), 7(1), 271–276.

Shukla, G. (2023). Doctrinal legal research: A library‐based research. In Social Research Methodology and Publishing Results (pp. 226–239). New York: IGI Global.

Sriwidodo, J., Wahid, S. H., & Kususiyanah, A. (2025). Toward equitable healthcare: A medical dispute resolution framework. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 17(3), 452-467.

Supardi, Y. Y., & Sari, I. D. (2019). Pelaksanaan standar pelayanan kefarmasian di apotek di beberapa kota di Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pelayanan Kesehatan, 3(3), 152–159.

Tangerang District Court. (2021). Decision No. 1324/Pdt.G/2021.

Tinggogoy, D. R. M., Rizkia, N. D., & Fardiansyah, H. (2023). Juridical review of medical malpractice in criminal law in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Contemporary Multidisciplinary Research, 1(2), 67-80.

Vranken, J. B. (2010). Methodology of legal doctrinal research. In Methodologies of Legal Research (pp. 111–121). Oxford: Hart Publishing.

Wibiansyah, K. T., Wahyudi, F., Bhima, S. K. L., & Dhanardhono, T. (2020). Enforcement of medical discipline violations in Indonesia. Diponegoro Medical Journal, 2(3), 92-105.

Wijaya, B. (2022). The role of informed consent in proving medical malpractice cases. Journal of Law, Politics and Social Sciences, 4(4), 34-51.

Winarsih, S. A., Widjanarko, B., & Agushybana, F. (2024). The impact of electronic medical records on BPJS claims and physician performance. Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi, 5(8), 112-125.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-09

How to Cite

Nugroho, E. A., & Anggraeni, H. Y. (2026). Legal Implications of Violating Healthcare Service Standards for BPJS Patients: A Juridical Study. Research Horizon, 5(6), 2909–2922. https://doi.org/10.54518/rh.5.6.2025.900

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.