Restorative Justice in Medical Disputes: Analyzing Responsiveness and Legal Neutrality Deficit from the Perspective of Healthcare Professionals
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54518/rh.5.6.2025.865Keywords:
Legal Neutrality, Medical Disputes, Repressive Law, Responsive Law, Restorative JusticeAbstract
The application of restorative justice in medical disputes in Indonesia faces significant structural obstacles. This study examines how healthcare professionals experience and perceive restorative justice, analyzes its vulnerabilities through the frameworks of responsive law and critical legal studies, and proposes a neutral, proportional model of dispute resolution, particularly through specialized medical adjudication, to address regulatory gaps that enable extortion risks and legal injustice. Using a phenomenological empirical-qualitative approach combined with statutory and critical legal analysis, the research evaluates the practical implementation of the Health Law (Law Number 17 of 2023). The findings show that restorative justice helps reduce adversarial litigation and protects the professional reputation of healthcare providers, who overwhelmingly prefer mediation to court proceedings. However, the lack of clear procedural limits and standardized restitution guidelines leaves practitioners vulnerable to misuse and disproportionate claims, causing the mechanism, intended to promote responsiveness, to drift toward repressive outcomes. This shift intensifies socio-economic inequalities and media-driven pressures, undermining legal neutrality and substantive justice. The study recommends the establishment of precise regulatory standards, independent oversight, and specialized medical adjudication mechanisms to ensure that restorative justice operates fairly, effectively, and in accordance with objective medical and legal principles.
Downloads
References
Adiputra, R., Sihotang, E., & Wiratny, N. K. (2024). Settlement of medical disputes through restorative justice according to Law No. 17 of 2023 concerning Health. Journal of Social Research, 3(8), 1–6.
Afandi, D., Pratimaratri, U., & media, Y. (2023). Perlindungan hukum bagi tenaga medis oleh rumah sakit dalam menjalankan praktik ketenagamedisan. Jurnal Ilmu Ketenagamedisan (Journal of Medical Science), 17(1), 1-9.
Ahidjo, N. (2024). The efficacy of restorative justice programs in reducing recidivism rates. Ijhss, 2(4), 38–51.
Amin, M., Adlie, T. A., Amir, F., Widodo, S. B., & Akhyar, A. (2020). Pencegahan penularan virus korona demi menjaga keamanan dan kenyamanan tenaga medis Rumah Sakit Umum Daerah (RSUD) Langsa melalui penggunaan pelindung wajah (face shield). Jurnal Vokasi, 5(1), 75-90.
Anesa, R., Hasnati, H., & Afrita, I. (2022). Penyelesaian sengketa medis antara tenaga medis gigi dan pasien di Kota Pekanbaru Berdasarkan Undang Undang Nomor 29 Tahun 2004 tentang Praktek Ketenagamedisan. Journal of Science and Social Research, 5(2), 343-357.
Arief, H., & Ambarsari, N. (2018). Penerapan prinsip restorative justice dalam sistem peradilan pidana di Indonesia. Al-Adl Jurnal Hukum, 10(2), 173-185,
Asa, A. I., Munir, M., & Ningsih, R. S. M. (2021). Nonet and Selznick’s responsive law concept in a historical philosophy perspective. Crepido, 3(2), 96–109.
Budiarsih, B. (2021). Pertanggungjawaban hukum tenaga medis atas kesalahan dalam mendiagnosis dalam pelayanan medis di rumah sakit. Jurnal Hukum Kesehatan Indonesia, 1(1), 49–58.
Franata, H. S., & Santiago, F. (2023). Juridical analysis of the application of restorative justice in corruption crimes in Indonesia. Journal of World Science, 2(4), 513–519.
Hafizah, H., & Fitriasih, S. (2022). Urgensi penyelesaian dugaan kesalahan medis melalui restorative justice. Jurnal Usm Law Review, 5(1), 205–223.
Hanganu, B., Iorga, M., Muraru, I.-D., & Ioan, B. G. (2020). Reasons for and facilitating factors of medical malpractice complaints. what can be done to prevent them? Medicina, 56(6), 259-270.
Indonesia. (2023). Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 17 of 2023 concerning Health.
Katz, E. (2019). Defensive medicine: a case and review of its status and possible solutions. Clinical Practice and Cases in Emergency Medicine, 3(4), 329–332.
Kimura, S. (2018). Medical Accidents Investigation System in Japan. Retrieved in 1 September 2025 from https://www.mhlw.go.jp/psgms2018/pdf/Day_1/Evening_Session/ES-2_Sosuke_Kimura_r.pdf
Kusyandi, A. (2023). Limits on the value of restitution for victims of crime a form of restorative justice system. 3rd International Conference on Law, Governance, and Social Justice (ICoLGaS 2023), 1(2), 376-386.
Kwon, S. (2015). Republic of Korea health system review. Health Systems in Transition, 5(4), 32-45.
Łakomy, J. (2020). Critical jurisprudence of Duncan Kennedy and the status of the theory of legal interpretation. Krytyka Prawa, 12(3), 70–89.
Mahendra, A. P. (2020). Mediasi penal pada tahap penyidikan berlandaskan keadilan restoratif. Jurist-Diction, 3(4), 1153-1165.
Maskanah, U. (2023). Implementation of restorative justice in medical dispute resolution. Jurnal Aisyah Jurnal Ilmu Kesehatan, 8(2), 10-23.
Mernawati, M., Fauzie Yusuf Hasibuan, N., & Kristiawanto, N. (2023). Formulation of strengthening restorative justice by the public prosecutor to realize legal certainty. International Journal of Engineering Business and Social Science, 2(2), 969–974.
Mujianto, M., Sibuea, H. P., & Kuba, S. (2023). Implementation of restorative justice in settlement of hate speech cases through social media in the ITE Law. Research Horizon, 3(2), 98–107.
Mustika, N. W. E., Darma, I. M. W., Kurniawan, I. G. A., & Thapa, N. Y. (2023). Restorative justice settles health disputes between patients and hospitals from an inclusive justice perspective. Jurnal Ius Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan, 11(3), 423–436.
Nelwitis, A., & Rias, A. I. (2023). Dasar pertimbangan dibentuknya pengadilan khusus profesi medis sebagai upaya pembaharuan hukum kesehatan nasional di Indonesia. Journal of Swara Justisia, 7(3), 1017–1031.
Nickson, R. (2024). Restorative justice in healthcare settings: better outcomes for patients and medical professionals. Alternative Law Journal, 49(2), 91–96.
Ramadhan, M., & Ariyanti, D. O. (2023). Tujuan pemidanaan dalam kebijakan pada pembaharuan hukum pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Rechten: Riset Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 5(1), 1-6.
Stewart, G. J. (2020). Demystifying CLS: A critical legal studies family tree. Adelaide Law Review, 41(1), 121-134.
Suparman, R. (2020). Perlindungan hukum dan tanggung jawab rumah sakit terhadap dokter dalam sengketa medis. Syiar Hukum Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 17(2), 188–215.
Taqiuddin, H. U., & Risdiana, R. (2022). Penerapan keadilan restoratif (restorative justice) dalam praktik ketatanegaraan. Jisip (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan), 6(1), 34-45.
Waluyo, B. (2015). Relevansi doktrin restorative justice dalam sistem pemidanaan di Indonesia. Hasanuddin Law Review, 1(2), 210-221.
Wenzel, M., Okimoto, T. G., & Cameron, K. (2011). Do retributive and restorative justice processes address different symbolic concerns? Critical Criminology, 20(1), 25–44.
Zhorif, A., Syachputa, M. R., Varandi, V., Halimi, A., & Pratama, M. A. (2024). Studi filsafat dalam gerakan hukum kritis: Analisis filsafat hukum kritis Roberto Unger dalam konteks Amerika. Praxis: Jurnal Filsafat Terapan, 2(01), 1-14.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Willy Johan, Ahmad Ma’mun Fikri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
