Measuring the Effectiveness of State Civil Apparatus Training
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54518/rh.2.5.2022.82Keywords:
ASN training, training evaluation, blended learning, pandemic impact, competence developmentAbstract
The study discusses the crucial role of training evaluation for State Civil Apparatus (Aparatur Sipil Negara or ASN) and how the shift to distance learning methods, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, has impacted training effectiveness. The evaluation aims to measure the impact of training on participants’ knowledge, skills, and attitudes, as well as its effects on the organizations. The results of the evaluation indicate that distance learning is preferred by alumni due to its flexibility, but there is a need for higher-quality facilitators in delivering content via information technology. Despite the remote nature of training, participants still achieve their intended competencies. The evaluation also assesses the impact of training on participants’ behavior and workplace performance. Notably, National Leadership Training Level I and II have a more positive influence on sustainability and work performance when using blended learning, while Administrator Leadership Training, Supervisory Leadership Training, and the Pre-Service Training Program show a stronger impact on sustainability and work performance with distance learning. The findings emphasize the significance of the chosen learning method in shaping training outcomes. This information is valuable for refining training policies to meet the evolving demands of the bureaucracy.
Downloads
References
Alam, A. (2020). What is the “Philosophy of Chemistry Education”? Viewing Philosophy behind Educational Ideas in Chemistry from John Dewey’s Lens: The Curriculum and the Entitlement to Knowledge. PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 17(9), 6857-6889.
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. et al. (Eds). (2001). A Taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Basarab Sr, D. J., & Root, D. K. (2012). The training evaluation process: A practical approach to evaluating corporate training programs (Vol. 33). Springer Science & Business Media.
Bojović, Ž., Bojović, P. D., Vujošević, D., & Šuh, J. (2020). Education in times of crisis: Rapid transition to distance learning. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 28(6), 1467-1489.
Chow, I. H. S., & Liu, S. S. (2013). The effect of aligning organizational culture and business strategy with HR systems on firm performance in Chinese enterprises. In ‘Making Sense’of Human Resource Management in China (pp. 124-142). Routledge.
Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, D. L., Coombs, C., Constantiou, I., Duan, Y., Edwards, J. S., ... & Upadhyay, N. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on information management research and practice: Transforming education, work, and life. International journal of information management, 55, 102211.
García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2021). Avoiding the dark side of digital transformation in teaching. An institutional reference framework for eLearning in higher education. Sustainability, 13(4)
Hai, T. N., Van, Q. N., & Thi Tuyet, M. N. (2021). Digital transformation: Opportunities and challenges for leaders in the emerging countries in response to COVID-19 pandemic. Emerging Science Journal, 5(1), 21-36.
Hecklau, F., Galeitzke, M., Flachs, S., & Kohl, H. (2016). Holistic approach for human resource management in Industry 4.0. Procedia Cirp, 54, 1-6.
Horn, M., B., & Staker, H. (2015). Blended: Using disruptive innovation to improve schools. Jossey-Bass.
Huang, W. H. Y., & Soman, D. (2013). Gamification of education. Report Series: Behavioural Economics in Action, 29, 11-12.
Irawati, E., Fitria, R., & Adawiyah, R. (2020). Covid-19 in Indonesia. Covid-19 response systems and international cooperation: Focusing on Korea, Thailand, Indonesia, and the Philippines, International Joint Research. KIPA.
Kaur, M. (2013). Blended learning-its challenges and future. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences, 93, 612-617.
Kelders, S. M., Van Zyl, L. E., & Ludden, G. D. (2020). The concept and components of engagement in different domains applied to ehealth: a systematic scoping review. Frontiers in psychology, 11, 926.
Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1959). Techniques for evaluating training programs. Journal of the American Society of Training Directors, 13, 3–9.
Rahayu, N. ., Suryanto, A., Andriansyah, A. ., & Irawati , E. . (2022). Measuring the Effectiveness of State Civil Apparatus Training. Research Horizon, 2(5). Retrieved from https://journal.lifescifi.com/index.php/RH/article/view/82
Rao, N. J. (2020). Outcome-based education: An outline. Higher Education for the Future, 7(1), 5-21.
Sartika, D. (2015). Inovasi organisasi dan kinerja organisasi: Studi kasus pada pusat kajian dan pendidikan dan Pelatihan Aparatur III Lembaga Administrasi Negara. Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 11(2).
Singh, M., Adebayo, S. O., Saini, M., & Singh, J. (2021). Indian government E-learning initiatives in response to COVID-19 crisis: A case study on online learning in Indian higher education system. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 7569-7607.
Sopacua, E., & Budijanto, D. (2007). The theory of Kirkpatrick on 4 level evaluation as tool to measure a post training evaluation. Health Systems Research Bulletin, 10, 371-379.
Tan, K., & Newman, E. (2013). The evaluation of sales force training in retail organizations: a test of Kirkpatrick’s four-level model. International Journal of Management, 30(2), 692.
Zhang, B., Zhang, Y., & Zhou, P. (2021). Consumer attitude towards sustainability of fast fashion products in the UK. Sustainability, 13(4), 1646.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Research Horizon
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
