Comparison of SAW, AHP, and TOPSIS Methods in a Decision Support System for Teacher Performance Evaluation

Bernadete Deta; Sesilia M. Ina Bedanaen

doi:10.54518/rh.5.5.2025.798

Authors

Bernadete Deta Institut Keguruan dan Teknologi Larantuka, Indonesia
Sesilia M. Ina Bedanaen Institut Keguruan dan Teknologi Larantuka, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54518/rh.5.5.2025.798

Keywords:

AHP, DSS, SAW, Teacher Performance Evaluation, TOPSIS

Abstract

Teachers are one of the important elements that schools must have in order to improve educational services. Teachers must always be motivated to provide the best educational services to their students, so that schools can improve the quality of schools to become great flagship schools. One effort to improve school quality is by evaluating teacher performance assessments. Conducting teacher performance assessments is an analytical process that aims to create better teaching and educational services. The teacher performance assessment process is still carried out manually and no specific methods are applied. With an assessment that is not detailed, it is feared that there will be subjective assessments and can have an impact on some parties that may be unfavorable. Therefore, to overcome the resulting decisions, a decision support system is needed by applying the SAW, AHP, and TOPSIS methods. Based on the results of the accuracy and suitability levels, the comparison of the total percentage of the SAW, AHP, and TOPSIS methods on both types of teacher performance regulations has the same suitability percentage of 99.99% and the same accuracy level of 100%, but there are differences in each resulting preference value.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amin, M., & Kurniawan, E. (2025). Perbandingan metode SAW dan Topsis dalam penilaian kinerja pegawai pada Kantor Desa Bandar Lama. Jurnal Informatika dan Teknologi Informasi, 3(3), 386–396.

Andriyani, N., & Hafiz, A. (2018). Perbandingan Metode AHP dan Topsis dalam penentuan siswa berprestasi. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Darmajaya, 1(1), 362–371.

Annisa, M., Supriyadi, D., & Wijayanto, A. (2018). Perbandingan metode SAW dan TOPSIS untuk sistem pendukung keputusan pemilihan pegawai terbaik. Conference on Electrical Engineering, Telematics, Industrial Technology, and Creative Media (CENTIVE), 1(1), 141–145.

Bugingo, E., & Ndimubenshi, E. L. (2025). Application of AHP in decision-making: Case studies. The Art of Decision Making-Applying AHP in Practice: Applying AHP in Practice, 121, (1), 1-10.

Cahyapratama, A., & Sarno, R. (2018, March). Application of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) methods in singer selection process. 2018 International Conference on Information and Communications Technology (ICOIACT), 1(1), 234-239.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). How teacher education matters. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(3), 166-173.

Fariza, M., Fadli, S., Ashari, M., & Saikin, S. (2025). Sistem pendukung keputusan evaluasi kinerja pegawai menggunakan metode Analytical Hierarchy Process dan Simple Additive Weighting. Decode: Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Informasi, 5(1), 252–261.

Firdaus, A., & Bachtiar, L. (2021). Analisis pemilihan siswa teladan dengan metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) & Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) berbasis web pada Sdn 11 Baamang Tengah. Jurnal Teknik Informatika, 9(2), 496448.

Galuh, Y., & Siregar, M. Y. (2025). Analisis implementasi metode AHP dan SAW pada sistem pendukung keputusan pemilihan siswa berprestasi pada sistem pendukung keputusan pemilihan siswa berprestasi. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, 2(1), 28–40.

Gao, Z., Hu, G., Akram, S., Ul Hassan, M., Shahzad, M. F., & Jan, S. A. (2025). Comparative analysis of managerial strategies for enhancing teacher motivation in Public and Private Schools. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 6272.

Gemawaty, C. A., & Yuliani, Y. (2023). Pemilihan dosen terbaik dengan metode SAW (Simple Additive Weighting). Journal of Information System, Applied, Management, Accounting and Research, 7(3), 711–717.

Handayani, M. (2023). Analisis perbandingan metode Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution, Simple Additive Weighting dan Weighted Product dalam sistem pendukung keputusan pemilihan guru terbaik. JSiI (Jurnal Sistem Informasi), 10(1), 33–40.

Harun, M. (2023). Komparasi metode SAW, TOPSIS dan Weighted Product dalam penentuan pemberian kredit anggota koperasi karyawan. Akrab Juara: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 8(3), 199–206.

Ibrahim, A., & Surya, R. A. (2019, October). The implementation of simple additive weighting (SAW) method in decision support system for the best school selection in Jambi. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1338 (1), 12-54. (

Krislock, N., & Wolkowicz, H. (2012). Euclidean distance matrices and applications. In Handbook on semidefinite, conic and polynomial optimization: New York: Spinger.

Lamrini, L., Abounaima, M. C., & Talibi Alaoui, M. (2023). New distributed-topsis approach for multi-criteria decision-making problems in a big data context. Journal of Big Data, 10(1), 97.

Latifah, S. M., & Diartono, D. A. (2023). Analisis perbandingan Metode Fuzzy Logic dan Metode SAW dalam pemilihan keluarga penerima bantuan sosial. Jurnal Informatika: Jurnal Pengembangan IT, 8(3), 193–198.

Laurentinus, L., & Rizan, O. (2022). Penerapan metode AHP dan SAW untuk rekomendasi keluarga kurang mampu penerima bantuan. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Terapan, 9(1), 62–69.

Librado, D., & Prabawa, T. (2024). Analisis komparatif klasterisasi penerima bantuan sosial menggunakan metode Topsis dan Saw. JIKO (Jurnal Informatika dan Komputer), 8(2), 318–328.

Mirdania, A., & Nawindah, N. (2021). Spk sistem pendukung keputusan pemilihan guru terbaik dengan metode Analytical Hierarchy Process dan Simple Additive Weighting. IDEALIS: Indonesia Journal Information System, 4(1), 117–126.

Murkatik, K., Harapan, E., & Wardiah, D. (2020). The influence of professional and pedagogic competence on teacher’s performance. Journal of social work and science education, 1(1), 58-69.

Nasyuha, A. H., Dhuhita, W. M. P., Harmayani, H., Marwanta, Y. Y., Chung, M. Y., & Ikhwan, A. (2025). A comparative study of three decision support methods: proving consistency in decision-making with identical inputs. TIERS Information Technology Journal, 6(1), 1-15.

Normah, N., Rifai, B., Vambudi, S., & Maulana, R. (2022). Analisa sentimen perkembangan vtuber dengan metode support vector machine berbasis SMOTE. Jurnal Teknik Komputer, 8(2), 174–180.

Nuraeni, Y. A., Nurjanah, N., Hendrawan, S. A., & Muhiban, A. (2025). Analisis perbandingan metode pendukung keputusan pemilihan skincare menggunakan metode SAW, WP, dan Smart. Transformasi, 21(1), 1-10.

Pelletier, L. G., & Rocchi, M. (2016). Teachers’ motivation in the classroom. Building autonomous learner, 1(2), 107-127.

Pramana, H. J., Mufizar, T., Anwar, D. S., & Septianingrum, I. (2022). Sistem pendukung keputusan penilaian kinerja guru dengan metode AHP dan PROMETHEE. It (Informatic Technique) Journal, 10(1), 87–99.

Rizky, R., Hakim, Z., Sugiarto, A., Wibowo, A. H., & Pratama, A. G. (2022). Implementasi metode Simple Additive Weighting untuk pemilihan benih padi di Kabupaten Pandeglang. Explor. J. Sist. Inf. dan Telemat, 13(2), 110.

Saaty, T. L., & Wind, Y. (1980). Marketing applications of the analytic hierarchy process. Management science, 26(7), 641-658.

Supardi, S., & Mahdiana, D. (2023). Sistem penerimaan asisten laboratorium komputer dengan menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarcy Process (AHP) dan Simple Multi Attribute Rating Technique (SMART). Jurnal Sisfokom (Sistem Informasi dan Komputer), 12(1), 90–95.

Undiadi, U., & Muhammad, M. (2025). The relationship between school principals' managerial skills and teacher performance quality. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 10(1), 483-491.