The Effect of Ease of Use, Benefits, and Risks on QRIS Usage Intention with Trust as Moderator

Authors

  • Much Musyarief Al Ansori Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
  • Endah Prapti Lestari Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54518/rh.5.4.2025.715

Keywords:

Perception of ease, Perception of benefits, Risk perception, Trust, Intention to use, QRIS, TAM

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the influence of perceived ease of use, perceived benefits, and perceived risks on the intention to use QRIS (Quick Response Code Indonesian Standard) in Semarang City, while also evaluating the role of trust as a moderating variable. The background of this research lies in the increasing adoption of digital payment systems in urban environments and the need to understand the behavioral drivers that shape user acceptance. Employing a quantitative explanatory approach, this study uses Partial Least Squares–Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) for data analysis. A total of 200 active QRIS users in Semarang participated in the survey. The findings indicate that both perceived ease of use and perceived benefits significantly and positively influence the intention to use QRIS. Perceived risk also shows a positive but weaker impact. Trust does not moderate the relationship between perceptions and intention to use, nor does it directly affect intention. However, trust is significantly influenced by ease and benefits, but not by perceived risk. These results refine the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and suggest that promoting usability and visible benefits is key to accelerating digital payment adoption.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amamilah. (2024). The Influence of User Perception on QRIS Usage Intention. Journal of Technology Management, 5(2), 134–147.

Azzahra, A. (2024). Pengaruh financial literacy, locus of control, dan income terhadap financial management behavior pada mahasiswa Fakultas Ekonomi UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang dengan financial self-efficacy sebagai variabel moderasi. Malang: Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim (Doctoral dissertation).

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2020). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). New Jersey: SAGE Publications.

Cut N. Faisal, N., Rachman, MA, & Sari, RP (2024). The Adoption of an Integrated QR Code Payment System of Indonesian MSME: An Extended TAM Approach. International Journal of Social Health, 5(1), 33–47.

Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.

Diah, R. (2023). Analysis of Digital Financial Technology Adoption Factors Using Purposive Sampling Method. Journal of Social Methodology, 7(1), 42–56.

Sauder, J. (2025). Role of Well-Being in Forming Employee Performance in Across Sectors. Journal of Current Research in Business and Economics, 4(1), 1193-1227.

Etikan, I., Musa, SA, & Alkassim, RS (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4.

Fadhilah, R., & Rizki, A. (2024). Risk Perception and Intention to Use QRIS. Journal of Digital Finance, 4(1), 73–85.

Fazriansyah, A. (2023). Do Perceived Ease of Use and Perceived Usefulness Affect Intention and Actual Use? Journal of Systems and Technology, 14(2), 90–104.

Florensia, IK, & Budiantara, M. (2023). The Influence of QRIS Use on MSME Development in Sleman Since the COVID-19 Pandemic. UBS Journal of Economics and Business, 12(3), 33–45.

Ghozali, I. (2018). Structural Equation Modeling: Alternative Method with Partial Least Squares (PLS-SEM) (4th ed.). Semarang: Diponegoro University Publishing Agency.

Ghozali, I., & Latan, H. (2021). Partial Least Squares (PLS): Concepts, Techniques and Applications Using SmartPLS 3.2.9. Semarang: UNDIP Publishing Agency.

Indrayani, T., & Saputra, H. (2024). Risk Perception on QRIS Usage Intention. Journal of Digital Technology, 6(1), 19–33.

Janna, H., & Herianto, R. (2021). Validity and Reliability of Social Research Instruments. Journal of Social Evaluation, 9(2), 104–116.

Jusman, J., & Fauziah, I. (2024). Receptiveness of QRIS as a Digital Payment Among MSME in Palopo City. Injurity: Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 3(10), 718-728.

Natsir, K., & Bangun, N. (2025). The role of corporate governance in the capital structure of banking companies. International Journal of Application on Economics and Business, 3(1), 495-508.

Lestari, SA, & Hidayat, M. (2023). Risk Perception in Using QRIS. Journal of Digital Economy, 7(2), 81–93.

Pasolo, M., R. & Afdana, DN (2023). Survey of Customers Using QRIS Mobile Payment in Jayapura City. Proceedings of the Indonesian Management Forum, 5(1), 110–123.

Nida, R., & Alfirdaus, Z. (2024, August). Driving Economic Growth via QRIS Adoption in Indonesia with Trust Moderating Variable. In 2024 3rd International Conference on Creative Communication and Innovative Technology (ICCIT) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.

Nuraini, D., & Hidayah, L. (2023). Benefits of Digital Payment Systems on User Trust. Journal of Information Systems and Technology, 4(1), 60–72.

Pontoh, R. (2022). Trust in Digital Financial Services: Indicators and Challenges. Journal of Financial Innovation, 3(2), 45–57.

Pratama, A., & Nugroho, S. (2024). Ease of Use and User Intention towards QRIS Payment System. Journal of Financial Technology, 4(3), 84–96.

Rahmawati, A., & Hidayat, B. (2023). Trust and Behavioral Intention in Fintech Adoption. Journal of Financial Innovation, 5(1), 64–78.

Ratnawati, N., & Malik, A. (2024). The Effect of Perceived Ease of Use, Benefits, and Risks on Intention in Using the Quick Response Code Indonesian Standard. Global Business & Finance Review, 29(1), 20–35.

Roberts, J., Wang, K., & Liu, J. (2024). Data Management in Social Science Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rupa, L. (2025). Social Statistics and Infinite Population Research Approach. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Sugiyono. (2021). Quantitative, Qualitative, and R&D Research Methods. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suryani, L., & Malik, A. (2024). The Impact of Trust on User Intention in Digital Payment Systems. Journal of Digital Commerce, 6(1), 41–55.

Wahyuni, E., & Sulistyowati, D. (2023). The Influence of Perceived Benefits on Intention to Use QRIS-Based Financial Technology. Journal of Information Systems and Technology, 5(2), 112–126.

Widyaningrum, R., Setiawan, D., & Andini, T. (2023). The Influence of Perceived Ease of Use on Intention to Use QRIS. Journal of Accounting and Information Systems, 11(2), 143–157.

Wijaya, R., Hartono, A., & Salsabila, M. (2024). Benefits and Intentions to Use Digital Payment Systems: A Study on Generation Z. Journal of Technology Management, 9(1), 95–110.

Wulandari, D., & Prasetyo, I. (2024). Moderating Effect of Trust in Digital Payment Intention. Journal of Consumer Behavior Research, 7(1), 59–72.

Yusuf, M., Nugraha, R., & Ardi, T. (2024). Ease and Trust in Adoption of Financial Technology. Journal of Technology and Society, 6(2), 78–92.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-30

How to Cite

Al Ansori, M. M., & Lestari, E. P. (2025). The Effect of Ease of Use, Benefits, and Risks on QRIS Usage Intention with Trust as Moderator. Research Horizon, 5(4), 1049–1062. https://doi.org/10.54518/rh.5.4.2025.715

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.