Determination of Network Technology of Fixed Broadband with Fuzzy Multiple Criteria for Decision Making Method

Juanda  Wijaya

doi:10.54518/rh.1.6.2021.43

Authors

Juanda Wijaya Mercu Buana, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54518/rh.1.6.2021.43

Keywords:

Fixed broadband network, fuzzy MCDM, SWOT

Abstract

To get the concept of developing an effective and efficient fixed broadband network, it is necessary to standardize fixed broadband access network technology. This standardization will facilitate in determining the design and development costs of the overall access network. In this paper, the process of determining the standardization of access networks is discussed through the Fuzzy SWOT MCDM (Multiple Criteria Decision Making) method. The process that is made is by establishing the SWOT access network technology that is available then the ranking process is carried out with fuzzy MCDM algorithm from the results of the questionnaire provided by network experts at PT. Indosat, one of the telecommunications network and service providers in Indonesia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anisseh, M., Yusuff, RbM., Shakarami, A., (2009). Aggregating group MCDM problems using a fuzzy Delphi model for personnel performance appraisal. Sci. Res. Essays, 4(5), 381-391.

Chang, H.H., & Huang, W.C., (2006). Application of a quantification SWOT analytical method. Mathematical and Computer Modeling, 43 (1), 158-169

Chang, P. L., & Chen, Y. C. (1994). A fuzzy multi-criteria decision making method for technology transfer strategy selection in biotechnology. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 63(2), 131-139.

Ding, J. & Chou,C., (2012). A Fuzzy MCDM Model to Evaluate Investment Risk of Location Selection for Container Terminals. Wseas Transaction on Information Science and Applications. 10 (9).

Dong, W., & Shah, H. C. (1987). Vertex method for computing functions of fuzzy variables. Fuzzy sets and Systems, 24(1), 65-78.

Dubois, D., & Prade, H., (1978). Operations on Fuzzy Numbers. The International Journal of Systems Science. 9 (6), 613-626.

Gerald, C. F, & Wheatley, P. O. (1990). Applied Numerical Analysis, 4th ed. New York: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

Hill, T. & Westbrook, R. (1997). SWOT Analysis: It’s Time for a Product Recall. Long Range Planning, 30 (1), 46-52.

Kurttila, M., Pesonen, M., Kangas, J., Kajanus, M., (2000). Utilizing the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in SWOT analysis-a hybrid method and its application to a forest-certification case. Forest Policy and Economics, 1 (1), 41-52.

Liou, T. S., & Wang, M. J. J. (1994). Subjective assessment of mental workload—A fuzzy linguistic multi-criteria approach. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 62(2), 155-165.

Liu, A. F. (1998). Structural life assessment methods. ASM international.

Yager, R. R. (2017). On using the shapley value to approximate the choquet integral in cases of uncertain arguments. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 26(3), 1303-1310.