Student Engagement in Blended Learning: A Systematic Literature Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54518/nes.1.1.2023.1205Keywords:
Blended Learning, Student Engagement, Higher Education, Active Learning, Learning Motivation, Student SatisfactionAbstract
Blended learning has become an important instructional approach in higher education by integrating face-to-face teaching with online learning environments to enhance student engagement. This study examines student engagement in blended learning through a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) using the PRISMA 2020 framework. Relevant studies published between 2019 and 2022 were systematically identified, screened, and analyzed using thematic analysis. The findings indicate that blended learning improves behavioral, cognitive, and emotional engagement by promoting active learning, collaboration, learning motivation, and student satisfaction. Teacher support, instructional design, and learning management systems also contribute to successful engagement. However, technological infrastructure, digital competence, instructor readiness, and institutional support remain major implementation challenges. The study concludes that effective pedagogical design and supportive learning environments are essential for maximizing the benefits of blended learning and improving student engagement in higher education.
References
Ahlin, E. M. (2020). A mixed-methods evaluation of a hybrid course modality to increase student engagement and mastery of course content in undergraduate research methods classes. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 32(1), 22–41.
Anthony Jr, B., Kamaludin, A., Romli, A., Raffei, A. F. M., Phon, D. N. A. E., Abdullah, A., & Ming, G. L. (2022). Blended learning adoption and implementation in higher education: A theoretical and systematic review. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 27(2), 531–578.
Bardorfer, A., & Dolenc, P. (2022). Teacher–student rapport as predictor of learning motivation within higher education: The self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Psychological & Educational Research, 30(2).
Castro, R. (2019). Blended learning in higher education: Trends and capabilities. Education and Information Technologies, 24(4), 2523–2546.
Chiu, T. K. (2021). Digital support for student engagement in blended learning based on self-determination theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 124, 106909.
de Brito Lima, F., Lautert, S. L., & Gomes, A. S. (2021). Contrasting levels of student engagement in blended and non-blended learning scenarios. Computers & Education, 172, 104241.
Fisher, R., Perényi, A., & Birdthistle, N. (2021). The positive relationship between flipped and blended learning and student engagement, performance and satisfaction. Active Learning in Higher Education, 22(2), 97–113.
Galvis, Á. H. (2018). Supporting decision-making processes on blended learning in higher education: Literature and good practices review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 1–38.
Han, F., & Ellis, R. A. (2021). Patterns of student collaborative learning in blended course designs based on their learning orientations: A student approaches to learning perspective. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 66.
Heilporn, G., Lakhal, S., & Bélisle, M. (2021). An examination of teachers' strategies to foster student engagement in blended learning in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 25.
Islam, M. K., Sarker, M. F. H., & Islam, M. S. (2022). Promoting student-centred blended learning in higher education: A model. E-learning and Digital Media, 19(1), 36–54.
Linnenluecke, M. K., Marrone, M., & Singh, A. K. (2020). Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses. Australian Journal of Management, 45(2), 175–194.
Mintzes, J. J., & Walter, E. M. (2020). Active Learning in College Science. Springer.
Mohd Nasir, F. D., Hussain, M. A. M., Mohamed, H., Mohd Mokhtar, M. A., & Abdul Karim, N. (2021). Student satisfaction in using a learning management system (LMS) for blended learning courses for tertiary education. Asian Journal of University Education, 17(4), 442–454.
Nur'aini, K. D., Werang, B. R., & Suryani, D. R. (2020). Student's learning motivation and learning outcomes in higher education. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Social Sciences (ICSS 2020) (pp. 463–466). Atlantis Press.
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71.
Prifti, R. (2022). Self-efficacy and student satisfaction in the context of blended learning courses. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 37(2), 111–125.
Raes, A., Detienne, L., Windey, I., & Depaepe, F. (2020). A systematic literature review on synchronous hybrid learning: Gaps identified. Learning Environments Research, 23(3), 269–290.
Roberts, D. (2019). Higher education lectures: From passive to active learning via imagery? Active Learning in Higher Education, 20(1), 63–77.
Sahni, J. (2019). Does blended learning enhance student engagement? Evidence from higher education. Journal of E-learning and Higher Education, 2019, 1–14.
Serrano, D. R., Dea-Ayuela, M. A., Gonzalez-Burgos, E., Serrano-Gil, A., & Lalatsa, A. (2019). Technology-enhanced learning in higher education: How to enhance student engagement through blended learning. European Journal of Education, 54(2), 273–286.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339.
