Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) Engineering: A Comparative Analysis between Norway and Canada
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54518/jaei.4.1.2026.1470Keywords:
Canada, Carbon Capture, CCUS Engineering, Comparative Analysis, Norway, Utilization, and StorageAbstract
Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) has emerged as a key engineering solution for reducing industrial carbon emissions and supporting the transition toward net-zero targets. Norway and Canada are recognized as global leaders in CCUS implementation, supported by strong government policies, advanced engineering capabilities, and large-scale demonstration projects. This study systematically reviews the development of CCUS engineering in both countries by synthesizing research published over the last fibe years. The review compares technological advancements, infrastructure development, carbon transportation and storage systems, policy frameworks, economic feasibility, and industrial implementation. The findings indicate that Norway has demonstrated significant progress in offshore geological storage and integrated carbon transport networks, while Canada has emphasized large-scale carbon capture applications in the energy and industrial sectors. Despite different implementation strategies, both countries highlight the importance of technological innovation, public investment, regulatory support, and international collaboration. This review provides comprehensive insights into current research trends, identifies existing challenges, and discusses future opportunities for advancing CCUS engineering as a sustainable pathway for global decarbonization.
References
Akhurst, M., Kirk, K., Neele, F., Grimstad, A. A., Bentham, M., & Bergmo, P. (2021). Storage Readiness Levels: communicating the maturity of site technical understanding, permitting and planning needed for storage operations using CO2. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 110, 103402.
Alkaraan, F., Elmarzouky, M., Hussainey, K., Venkatesh, V. G., Shi, Y., & Gulko, N. (2024). Reinforcing green business strategies with Industry 4.0 and governance towards sustainability: Natural‐resource‐based view and dynamic capability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(4), 3588-3606.
Ampomah, W., Morgan, A., Koranteng, D. O., & Nyamekye, W. I. (2024). CCUS perspectives: Assessing historical contexts, current realities, and future prospects. Energies, 17(17), 4248.
Chaube, A., Chapman, A., Shigetomi, Y., Huff, K., & Stubbins, J. (2020). The role of hydrogen in achieving long term Japanese energy system goals. Energies, 13(17), 4539.
Cooper, R. G. (2021). Accelerating innovation: Some lessons from the pandemic. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 38(2), 221-232.
Fernandez, M. I., Go, Y. I., Wong, D. M., & Früh, W. G. (2024). Review of challenges and key enablers in energy systems towards net zero target: Renewables, storage, buildings, & grid technologies. Heliyon, 10(23).
Hanna, T. P., King, W. D., Thibodeau, S., Jalink, M., Paulin, G. A., Harvey-Jones, E., ... & Aggarwal, A. (2020). Mortality due to cancer treatment delay: systematic review and meta-analysis. bmj, 371.
Khogali, H. O., & Mekid, S. (2023). The blended future of automation and AI: Examining some long-term societal and ethical impact features. Technology in Society, 73, 102232.
Litvinenko, V. S. (2020). Digital economy as a factor in the technological development of the mineral sector. Natural Resources Research, 29(3), 1521-1541.
Marbun, B. T. H., Sinaga, S. Z., Purbantanu, B., Santoso, D., Kadir, W. G. A., Sule, R., ... & Andhika, B. (2023). Lesson learned from the assessment of planned converted CO2 injection well integrity in Indonesia–CCUS project. Heliyon, 9(8).
Nguyen, C. P., & Lee, G. S. (2021). Uncertainty, financial development, and FDI inflows: Global evidence. Economic Modelling, 99, 105473.
Ooi, K. B., Tan, G. W. H., Al-Emran, M., Al-Sharafi, M. A., Arpaci, I., Zaidan, A. A., ... & Iranmanesh, M. (2023). The metaverse in engineering management: overview, opportunities, challenges, and future research agenda. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 13882-13889.
Peres, C. B., Resende, P. M., Nunes, L. J., & Morais, L. C. D. (2022). Advances in carbon capture and use (CCU) technologies: a comprehensive review and CO2 mitigation potential analysis. Clean technologies, 4(4), 1193-1207.
Pregnolato, M., Gunner, S., Voyagaki, E., De Risi, R., Carhart, N., Gavriel, G., ... & Taylor, C. (2022). Towards Civil Engineering 4.0: Concept, workflow and application of Digital Twins for existing infrastructure. Automation in Construction, 141, 104421.
Saxena, A., Prakash Gupta, J., Tiwary, J. K., Kumar, A., Sharma, S., Pandey, G., ... & Raghav Chaturvedi, K. (2024). Innovative pathways in carbon capture: advancements and strategic approaches for effective carbon capture, utilization, and storage. Sustainability, 16(22), 10132.
Sullivan, M., Rodosta, T., Mahajan, K., & Damiani, D. (2020). An overview of the Department of Energy's CarbonSAFE Initiative: Moving CCUS toward commercialization. AIChE Journal, 66(4), e16855.
Wildenborg, T., Loeve, D., & Neele, F. (2022). Large-scale CO2 transport and storage infrastructure development and cost estimation in the Netherlands offshore. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 118, 103649.
Yan, Y., Borhani, T. N., Subraveti, S. G., Pai, K. N., Prasad, V., Rajendran, A., ... & Clough, P. T. (2021). Harnessing the power of machine learning for carbon capture, utilisation, and storage (CCUS)–a state-of-the-art review. Energy & Environmental Science, 14(12), 6122-6157.
