Hydrogen Energy Infrastructure Development: A Comparative Study between Australia and Japan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54518/jaei.4.1.2026.1472Keywords:
Australia, Energy Infrastructure, Hydrogen Energy, Japan, Sustainable EnergyAbstract
Hydrogen energy has emerged as a strategic solution for achieving carbon neutrality and enhancing long-term energy security. Australia and Japan have adopted complementary approaches to hydrogen infrastructure development, with Australia focusing on large-scale renewable hydrogen production and export, while Japan emphasizes hydrogen utilization, import systems, and end-use technologies. This study aims to compare hydrogen energy infrastructure development in both countries through a systematic literature review by synthesizing recent research on policy frameworks, production technologies, transportation, storage, distribution networks, and industrial applications. The review identifies similarities and differences in national strategies, investment priorities, and technological readiness while evaluating the challenges associated with cost reduction, infrastructure integration, international supply chains, and market expansion. The findings indicate that collaboration between hydrogen-exporting and hydrogen-importing countries can accelerate the global hydrogen economy by improving technological innovation, strengthening supply chain resilience, and supporting sustainable energy transitions. The study provides insights for policymakers, researchers, and industry stakeholders seeking to develop efficient, resilient, and low-carbon hydrogen infrastructure.
References
Belaïd, F., Al-Sarihi, A., & Al-Mestneer, R. (2023). Balancing climate mitigation and energy security goals amid converging global energy crises: The role of green investments. Renewable Energy, 205, 534-542.
Blaizot, A., Veettil, S. K., Saidoung, P., Moreno‐Garcia, C. F., Wiratunga, N., Aceves‐Martins, M., ... & Chaiyakunapruk, N. (2022). Using artificial intelligence methods for systematic review in health sciences: a systematic review. Research Synthesis Methods, 13(3), 353-362.
Devlin, A., & Yang, A. (2022). Regional supply chains for decarbonising steel: energy efficiency and green premium mitigation. Energy Conversion and Management, 254, 115268.
Dewangan, S. K., Mohan, M., Kumar, V., Sharma, A., & Ahn, B. (2022). A comprehensive review of the prospects for future hydrogen storage in materials‐application and outstanding issues. International journal of energy research, 46(12), 16150-16177.
Du, L., Yang, Y., Zhou, L., & Liu, M. (2024). Greenhouse gas reduction potential and economics of green hydrogen via water electrolysis: A systematic review of value-chain-wide decarbonization. Sustainability, 16(11), 4602.
Falcone, P. M., Hiete, M., & Sapio, A. (2021). Hydrogen economy and sustainable development goals: Review and policy insights. Current opinion in green and sustainable chemistry, 31, 100506.
Fu, P., Pudjianto, D., Zhang, X., & Strbac, G. (2020). Integration of hydrogen into multi-energy systems optimisation. Energies, 13(7), 1606.
Heeß, P., Rockstuhl, J., Körner, M. F., & Strüker, J. (2024). Enhancing trust in global supply chains: Conceptualizing Digital Product Passports for a low-carbon hydrogen market. Electronic Markets, 34(1), 10.
Kar, S. K., Sinha, A. S. K., Bansal, R., Shabani, B., & Harichandan, S. (2023). Overview of hydrogen economy in Australia. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, 12(1), e457.
Kountouris, I., Bramstoft, R., Madsen, T., Gea-Bermúdez, J., Münster, M., & Keles, D. (2024). A unified European hydrogen infrastructure planning to support the rapid scale-up of hydrogen production. Nature communications, 15(1), 5517.
Koyamparambath, A., Santillán-Saldivar, J., McLellan, B., & Sonnemann, G. (2022). Supply risk evolution of raw materials for batteries and fossil fuels for selected OECD countries (2000–2018). Resources Policy, 75, 102465.
Lau, H. C., Zhang, K., Bokka, H. K., & Ramakrishna, S. (2022). A review of the status of fossil and renewable energies in Southeast Asia and its implications on the decarbonization of ASEAN. Energies, 15(6), 2152.
Pandey, N., De Coninck, H., & Sagar, A. D. (2022). Beyond technology transfer: Innovation cooperation to advance sustainable development in developing countries. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, 11(2), e422.
Peters, E., Knight, L., Boersma, K., & Uenk, N. (2023). Organizing for supply chain resilience: a high reliability network perspective. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 43(1), 48-69.
Pickering, B., Lombardi, F., & Pfenninger, S. (2022). Diversity of options to eliminate fossil fuels and reach carbon neutrality across the entire European energy system. Joule, 6(6), 1253-1276.
Prokopenko, O., Kurbatova, T., Khalilova, M., Zerkal, A., Prause, G., Binda, J., ... & Komarnitskyi, I. (2023). Impact of investments and R&D costs in renewable energy technologies on companies’ profitability indicators: Assessment and forecast. Energies, 16(3), 1021.
Rabbi, M. F., Popp, J., Máté, D., & Kovács, S. (2022). Energy security and energy transition to achieve carbon neutrality. Energies, 15(21), 8126.
Sadiq, M., Ali, S. W., Terriche, Y., Mutarraf, M. U., Hassan, M. A., Hamid, K., ... & Guerrero, J. M. (2021). Future greener seaports: A review of new infrastructure, challenges, and energy efficiency measures. Ieee Access, 9, 75568-75587.
Shirizadeh, B., Ailleret, A., Guillon, A., Bovari, E., El Khatib, N., Douguet, S., ... & Trüby, J. (2023). Towards a resilient and cost-competitive clean hydrogen economy: the future is green. Energy & Environmental Science, 16(12), 6094-6109.
Shmeleva, N., Gamidullaeva, L., Tolstykh, T., & Lazarenko, D. (2021). Challenges and opportunities for technology transfer networks in the context of open innovation: Russian experience. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(3), 197.
Tian, X., & Lu, H. (2023). Digital infrastructure and cross-regional collaborative innovation in enterprises. Finance Research Letters, 58, 104635.
