Environmental Governance and Democratic Accountability: An International Legal Perspective

Authors

Hendri Jayadi Universitas Kristen Indonesia, Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54518/ldi.3.1.2025.1319

Keywords:

Access To Information, Democratic Governance, Transparency, Accountability, Uncac, Tromsø Convention

Abstract

Access to information is a fundamental component of democratic governance because it supports transparency, accountability, citizen participation, and institutional legitimacy. This study examines the relationship between access to information and democratic governance through a qualitative Systematic Literature Review (SLR) based on the United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) and the Tromsø Convention. Using the PRISMA 2020 framework, relevant literature published between 2020 and 2025 was systematically reviewed. The findings indicate that access to information strengthens democratic governance by improving transparency, enhancing public accountability, promoting informed citizen participation, and increasing public trust in institutions. However, challenges related to misinformation, artificial intelligence governance, digital transparency, and information inequality continue to affect information governance. The study concludes that effective access-to-information frameworks remain essential for sustaining democratic governance and accountability.

References

Androniceanu, A. (2021). Transparency in public administration as a challenge for a good democratic governance. Revista Administratie si Management Public (RAMP), 36, 149–164.

Elekyabi, D. S. Y. (2021). Recovering the proceeds of corruption: A study on the effectiveness of the implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC). UAEU Law Journal, 2021(86), 8.

Erkkilä, T. (2020). Transparency in public administration. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Oxford University Press.

Gorwa, R., & Ash, T. G. (2020). Democratic transparency in the platform society. In N. Persily & J. A. Tucker (Eds.), Social Media and Democracy: The State of the Field and Prospects for Reform (pp. 286–312).

Han, L. (2022). Reviewing international anti-corruption cooperation arrangements in China: Based on the implementation review mechanism of UNCAC. Crime, Law and Social Change, 77(2), 133–157.

Kassen, M. (2022). Open data governance in Sweden: Government data transparency in the context of social democracy. In Open Data Governance and Its Actors: Theory and Practice (pp. 97–132). Springer.

Linnenluecke, M. K., Marrone, M., & Singh, A. K. (2020). Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses. Australian Journal of Management, 45(2), 175–194.

Marciel, R. (2023). On Citizens' Right to Information: Justification and Analysis of the Democratic Right to Be Well Informed.

Monsees, L. (2023). Information disorder, fake news and the future of democracy. Globalizations, 20(1), 153–168.

Moon, M. J. (2020). Shifting from old open government to new open government: Four critical dimensions and case illustrations. Public Performance & Management Review, 43(3), 535–559.

Mosweu, O., & Rakemane, D. (2020). The role of records management in ensuring good governance in Africa: Impediments and solutions. Journal of the South African Society of Archivists, 53(1), 103–123.

Oliveira, D. J. S., & Ckagnazaroff, I. B. (2023). Citizen participation as one of the principles of open government. Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania, 28, e84867.

Olsen, H. P., Hildebrandt, T. T., Wiesener, C., Larsen, M. S., & Flügge, A. W. A. (2024). The right to transparency in public governance: Freedom of information and the use of artificial intelligence by public agencies. Digital Government: Research and Practice, 5(1), 1–15.

Osae, I. B., Mardiste, P., Stober, D., Eiter, S., Buchecker, M., & Suškevičs, M. (2024). Access to information and public participation: Evaluating the implementation of the Aarhus Convention in Europe. European Planning Studies, 32(12), 2449–2472.

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71.

Porumbescu, G., Meijer, A., & Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2022). Government Transparency: State of the Art and New Perspectives. Cambridge University Press.

Rosenberger, L., & Gorman, L. (2020). How democracies can win the information contest. The Washington Quarterly, 43(2), 75–96.

Saldanha, D. M. F., Dias, C. N., & Guillaumon, S. (2022). Transparency and accountability in digital public services: Learning from the Brazilian cases. Government Information Quarterly, 39(2), 101680.

Samaratunge, R., & Alam, Q. (2021). Accountability and transparency in emerging countries: Governance, democratic currents and change. Public Administration and Development, 41(4), 147–156.

Sari, R., & Muslim, M. (2023). Accountability and transparency in public sector accounting: A systematic review. Amkop Management Accounting Review, 3(2), 90–106.

Siahay, A. Z. (2023). Building public trust through transparency and accountability: A systematic review of the role of public sector accounting. Jurnal Economic Resource, 6(2), 423–430.

Simelio Solà, N., Ferré Pavia, C., & Herrero Gutiérrez, F. J. (2021). Transparent information and access to citizen participation on municipal websites. Profesional de la Información, 30(2), e300211.

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339.

Szekely, I. (2021). Freedom of information: A constitutive public good in democratic societies. In Research Handbook on Information Policy (pp. 205–219). Edward Elgar Publishing.

Tennant, I., & Paula Oliveira, A. (2024). Applying the right lessons from the negotiation and implementation of the UNTOC and the UNCAC to the implementation of the newly agreed UN cybercrime treaty. Journal of Cyber Policy, 9(2), 221–238.

Widiatmoko, C., Simarmata, R. P., Gunadi, G. A., Amazihono, M., & Watimena, J. S. (2023). E-government as a tool to increase public participation in public decision making. ARRUS Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(3), 272–278.

Wong, A., Perehudoff, K., & Kohler, J. C. (2024). Legislating for good governance in the pharmaceutical sector through UN Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) compliance. Global Public Health, 19(1), 2350649.

Zafarullah, H., & Siddiquee, N. A. (2023). Open government and freedom of information. In Open Government and Freedom of Information (pp. 3–26). Palgrave Macmillan.

Zeitzmann, S. (2021). The Council of Europe’s Tromsø Convention on Access to Official Documents. European Data Protection Law Review, 7(2), 232.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-30

How to Cite

Jayadi, H. (2025). Environmental Governance and Democratic Accountability: An International Legal Perspective. Law and Democracy Insight, 3(1), 77–104. https://doi.org/10.54518/ldi.3.1.2025.1319