Civil Society and Democratic Governance: An International Legal Perspective

Authors

  • Hoiruddin Hasibuan Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang, Semarang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54518/ldi.3.2.2025.1347

Keywords:

Civil Society, Democratic Governance, Freedom Of Association, Civic Participation, Accountability, International Law

Abstract

Civil society plays an important role in democratic governance by promoting participation, accountability, and public oversight. This study examines the relationship between civil society and democratic governance through a qualitative Systematic Literature Review (SLR) based on the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the United Nations Declaration on Human Rights Defenders. Using the PRISMA 2020 framework, relevant literature published between 2020 and 2025 was systematically reviewed. The findings indicate that civil society strengthens democratic governance by enhancing citizen participation, supporting accountability mechanisms, promoting democratic legitimacy, and contributing to democratic resilience. However, challenges related to shrinking civic space, restrictions on civic freedoms, threats against human rights defenders, and digital governance continue to affect civic engagement. The study concludes that protecting civil society remains essential for sustaining democratic governance.

References

Arato, A., & Cohen, J. L. (2021). Populism and civil society: The challenge to constitutional democracy. Oxford University Press.

Bakke, K. M., Mitchell, N. J., & Smidt, H. M. (2020). When states crack down on human rights defenders. International Studies Quarterly, 64(1), 85–96.

Bernhard, M., Hicken, A., Reenock, C., & Lindberg, S. I. (2020). Parties, civil society, and the deterrence of democratic defection. Studies in Comparative International Development, 55(1), 1–26.

Birchall, D. (2020). The role of civil society and human rights defenders in corporate accountability. In Research Handbook on Human Rights and Business (pp. 422–445).

Dvoskin, B. (2022). Representation without elections: Civil society participation as a remedy for the democratic deficits of online speech governance. Villanova Law Review, 67(3), 447.

Egholm, L., Heyse, L., & Mourey, D. (2020). Civil society organizations: The site of legitimizing the common good—a literature review. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 31(1), 1–18.

Hegre, H., Bernhard, M., & Teorell, J. (2020). Civil society and the democratic peace. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 64(1), 32–62.

Jessop, B. (2020). Putting civil society in its place: Governance, metagovernance and subjectivity.

Joseph, S. (2022). International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). Edward Elgar Publishing.

Kiai, M., & Kaguongo, W. (2023). Freedom of peaceful assembly and of association: Practices and obstacles. In Research Handbook on the Politics of Human Rights Law (pp. 99–114). Edward Elgar Publishing.

Krain, M., Murdie, A., & Beard, A. (2024). Silencing human rights defenders once and for all? Determinants of human rights defenders’ killings. Political Research Quarterly, 77(1), 401–416.

Linnenluecke, M. K., Marrone, M., & Singh, A. K. (2020). Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses. Australian Journal of Management, 45(2), 175–194.

Lorch, J. (2021). Elite capture, civil society and democratic backsliding in Bangladesh, Thailand and the Philippines. Democratization, 28(1), 81–102.

Mavee, S. E. A. (2022). The relevance of civil society participation in democratic governance. Administratio Publica, 30(3), 171–191.

Merkel, W., & Lührmann, A. (2021). Resilience of democracies: Responses to illiberal and authoritarian challenges. Democratization, 28(5), 869–884.

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71.

Pospieszna, P., & Pietrzyk-Reeves, D. (2022). Responses of Polish NGOs engaged in democracy promotion to shrinking civic space. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 35(4), 523–544.

Sankaran, K. (2024). Democracy, universalism and informal employment: The Committee on Freedom of Association and South Asia. In 70 Years of the ILO Committee on Freedom of Association: A Reliable Compass in Any Weather.

Sellers, J. M., Lidström, A., & Bae, Y. (2020). Multilevel Democracy: How Local Institutions and Civil Society Shape the Modern State. Cambridge University Press.

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339.

Strachwitz, R. G., & Toepler, S. (2022). Contested civic spaces in liberal democracies. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 13(3), 179–193.

Suwana, F. (2020). What motivates digital activism? The case of the Save KPK movement in Indonesia. Information, Communication & Society, 23(9), 1295–1310.

Uerpmann-Wittzack, R. (2022). Freedom of association: The shrinking space of civil society. In Democracy and Sovereignty (pp. 169–180). Brill Nijhoff.

Weber, A. (2024). Civil liberties II: Freedom of thought, expression, religion, assembly, association, and movement. In Writing Constitutions: Volume 2: Fundamental Rights (pp. 151–196). Springer.

Warren, M. E. (2021). Democracy and Association.

Zakhour, S. (2020). The democratic legitimacy of public participation in planning: Contrasting optimistic, critical, and agnostic understandings. Planning Theory, 19(4), 349–370.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

Hasibuan, H. (2025). Civil Society and Democratic Governance: An International Legal Perspective. Law and Democracy Insight, 3(2), 116–133. https://doi.org/10.54518/ldi.3.2.2025.1347

Issue

Section

Articles